Eight Things to Know About the New Sydney Push

There’s been some conversation about my very personal blog post about the idea of the Sydney Push and its successors.  I intended it to be a musing about the nature of cliques and what they are both capable of achieving, but also the personal impacts of such groups. It wasn’t meant to be particularly exhaustive or comprehensive.  The subsequent conversation has led to me considering some key points about a New Sydney Push, their place in history and the challenges they face when compared to those faced by the 50s / 60s Push.

1.The Challenges of the Era Have Changed Just a Touch

A feature of the original Sydney Push was that there were existing journalists and aspiring writers, and a host of others in between.  Those existing journalists would have had to write a whole range of boring pap in a tightly controlling, moralistic era. It was an era, for example, that the Chief Conductor of the Sydney Symphony Orchestra and Head of the Conservatorium, Eugene Goossens, was hounded out of the country for bringing into the country pornographic photos, rubber masks and sticks of incense.  It’s little wonder they were straining under the weight of the Menzies era and wanted a bit of libertarian freedom.

This era poses different issues, though some appear fairly similar. Conservatism and moralism remain, expressed through various channels such as the Daily Telegraph, various outrage-seeking talkback radio shows (which seems to have a hold on Sydney like in no other), the old-people-raging-at-clouds editorial team at The Australian as well as many of our politicians.  The continuing desire to collect metadata and somehow control the internet, for example, is something to rebel against.  There’s also a need to rail against the many privileged media pulpit spruikers like Miranda Devine, Paul Sheehan, Angela Shanahan, et al, who continue to wilfully misunderstand gender politics, domestic violence and issues relating to race and express that loudly. The difference now is though is that the voices of the young and the divergent have a place and are standing up to those with bully pulpits.

2. The Power and Privilege of the Old Guard

There’s solid reasons why the New Sydney Push spend a considerable amount of time talking negatively about the Baby Boomer generation.  For one, the continuing ownership of inner city housing and objection to the construction of new apartments is perceived as a scheme to protect their interests and shut Generation Y out of a foot in the door.  Plus, these days, there’s the new phenomenon of baby boomers investing in the flats of Sydney and becoming landlords – a bit of a shift from the supposed revolutionary urges of those who grew up in the 1960s. There’s also the Boomer domination of media and politics, with their sometimes outdated attitudes and opinions that grate. That opposition and tension is to be expected with any generational shift.

This reality poses a difficulty for the new Sydney Push – that is that they face the uncertainty of the future, whether they can continue to afford living in Sydney and not to be seen to “sell out” and adapt to industries and professions that might require actions at variance to passionately held – and fundamentally good – values and attitudes.

The original Sydney Push took a variety of paths, whether that was to go into full time journalism, lecturing or becoming expats. The latter path was the one taken by Clive James and Germaine Greer, who did take the fresh challenging air of the Push to their various stages.  They may have become figures that are the subject for derision since, but we can’t deny their brilliance and sharp wit.  It may be harder, however, for the current bright young things of Sydney to become successful expats in the mould of Greer and James.  The London that accepted the energy of James and Greer and helped to make them powerful voices has changed a fair amount since those days.

3. The advantages and disadvantages to being a close knit group in a social media age

Any good teacher will tell you that group work and close knit groups in general can have their advantages in terms of cultural production.  Having people around you know can be a help when developing ideas, treatments and the like. This is why groups like the original Sydney Push worked in terms of fuelling passionate discussion and formulating ideas. Eventually, that group split up socially and spread around the world, but the ideas that were sparked and moulded in the crucible of the Royal George went on and grew.  That’s a challenge for any group of people in their 20s seeking to find their place in the world.  It’s also inevitable that a group of intelligent, sharp witted friends will flock together and seek support and mateship.

4. New Media gives a more immediate Voice… but, there’s problems

One of the advantages for the New Sydney Push is that they are being provided with employment, forums and spaces in places that weren’t around for the original Push. That’s why we see their work, ideas and beliefs in a variety of publications.  We therefore see some great work from the new Push, along with the weak.  Sometimes having to produce a lot of work means that quality isn’t always assured – a commonality with any form of cultural production.  It shouldn’t be assumed at all that because the work is from Gen Y that it’s immediately to be suspect and not provided with respect.

There’s also a shift in terms of the requirements new media place on the members of the new Sydney Push.  There’s the continually frustrating word limits, but more deeply, there’s the requirement to be able to follow the buzz of the news cycle and produce work that is going to be read by as many as possible. This is not a revelation, of course, but it is a shift away from the free idea creation and conversations of the likes of James and Greer in the original Push.

That produces a conundrum for us reading the likes of Buzzfeed and Junkee. Many people may dislike some of the subject matter and decry the listicles of trivialities, but that is what is needed in the new media environment. We as the audience are only barely aware of the statistics behind the scenes – the stats that drive the pitch to advertisers.   What would perhaps be better for us as the observers to do is build filters that seek only what we need and put aside the rage that could be induced by the presence of some of the content being pumped out by members of the Push. After all, there’s a lot of quality, meaty content being provided by Push members in these new media outlets, which should not be forgotten.  I would also add that a lot of the satire coming from the makers of Backburner on SBS is also excellent. Ultimately, though, throwing the switch the vaudeville is a necessity for many.  After all, Clive James is better known to more people as the host of a show that laughed at Japanese game shows than as the writer of Cultural Amnesia.

That’s the reason I included in the first post a mention of a Halloween photo of members of the new Push ending up in New York Magazine.  Such photos and the unexpected buzz they create is a part of the new media environment, which is a pretty solid difference between this era and the 60s – in some ways anyway.  The idea that the original Push members were always serious and weighty while the new ones aren’t ever is pretty inaccurate. Think of the often puerile jokes in Oz Magazine and then in the films of the early 70s like Stork.  Using the Clive James example again, I don’t think he or the fans of his heavier tomes would have ever suspected he would become a pop culture icon who would also be romancing the ex-wife of Geoffrey Edelsten.  But he did, and he had fun in that life.  I think the so-called “Hennoween” photo was a funny moment, good for a chuckle and then people can move on, as is what happens in this era.

5. Yes, there’s going to be exclusions

I think some people may have misread my original post as being jealousy at being excluded from the new Sydney Push – understandable, as I was writing it from the perspective of someone reminiscing over his sadness tinged uni days where I felt excluded, even if I wasn’t as much as I perceived.  Anxiety is a bastard and is worse when you are away from your cocoon.  There’s memories that came when I wrote the post that I couldn’t repeat here.

Honestly, though, someone like me shouldn’t be included in any group like the Sydney Push. I’m too conservative, regional, establishment and old for such a group. My philosophies and approaches to ideas are too much shaped by compromised, pragmatic decisions I’ve had to make and continue to make.  The people in the Push are, for the most part, wishing to challenge what’s been, learn about the world, make their own mistakes and perhaps gain wisdom.  I represent much of what they are rebelling against and will continue to. I’m not that changeable in my core values and attitudes, even if I am able to have my mind changed by a good counter argument.

It is, however, inevitable that there will be exclusions from any clique of people who are younger than me who have a more serious objection to the actions and access of that group.  For me, I have realised over time that I have little desire to write paid opinion pieces or be part of that media world. I’m happy in my own professional and personal life and my blog posts and twitter life is a leisure activity only.

For others, though, I can understand the frustration they feel when they aren’t getting the paid opportunities and access that is being afforded the members of the new Sydney Push.  It’s also inevitable, therefore, that there will be criticism from people who feel as though others outside the Push should be provided with more opportunities.  How that is handled and dealt with, however, is a different story.  I don’t envy the job of editors and managers of new media outlets trying to obtain buzz and clicks through the employment of the right people. As we have seen, the people who seem to be the right people emerge on Twitter through their engagement with others and with content.  Time tells, however, how successful they continue to be – and that success can often be very fleeting and based on factors outside the control of the creators of content.

6. The Spaces for Connection are More Virtual than Physical

The original Sydney Push could only connect in person, at pubs, before the six o’clock swill. That’s not the case for the new Sydney Push. They do connect offline, but they also have good times online.  Plus, it means that the New Sydney Push is based in Sydney, but connects outwards. That’s a mix of the busy lives of Gen Y and the ease of online connection colliding in a mostly positive way.  The problem lays, however, with the public nature of the interactions. In the past, those outside such cliques didn’t see any of that bonding and therefore people couldn’t form an opinion about the form of that bonding. We didn’t see, for example, what kinds of tricks Clive James may have played. Or what Paddy McGuinness may have said about someone. Or Germaine Greer’s opinion about a particular issue of the day and how others responded to those.  We only hear about those things in second, third, fourth hand versions. But now, we can all see how the bonding happens with codes, conversations, subtweets.

I’ll admit here that I have expressed dislike towards the forms of bonding at times – and, looking back at it, I probably should have held back my tweets and just seen it for what it was – but then comment only if it becomes abusive or belittling to others. This is an approach I am currently working on adopting.   Difficulty is for everyone, though, is that the bonding patterns have become permanent records on social media and commented on from a variety of angles.

That’s tough for everyone in their 20s and younger.

7. Who Are These People?

The members of the new Sydney Push are from a fairly diverse background when compared to the original – and far fewer are connected to Sydney University (which is a good thing, frankly). My list isn’t exhaustive and I’d like to add to them if people can throw me some ideas. There’s a fair few members of the Push that I don’t really know all that well. But here goes as a start (and I apologise in advance to those I have excluded):

Guardian Writers (regular and occasional) – Adam Brereton, Osman Faruqi, J. R. Hennessy, Bridie Jabour, Liam Hogan, Dan Nolan, Erin Riley, Eleanor Robertson

SBS Writers and Presenters – The Feed Crew – Marc Fennell, Jeanette Francis, Andy Park (once upon a time), Patrick Abboud ; The Backburner writers (I know only the name of one of them – Jam Colley, sorry Backburner people, I do like what you do, but I don’t know your names)

Buzzfeeders – Mark Di Stefano, Rob Stott, Alex Lee, Mikey Nicholson, Lane Sainty, Jenna Guillaume, Mat Whitehead, Brad Esposito

Freelance Writers – Elle Hardy, Lauren Ingram, Kate Iselin, Rebecca Shaw, @courtwhip, Kate Doak

The Hungry Beast Crew (I still mourn the loss of one of my favourite shows of the last few years) – Kirsten Drysdale, Dan Ilic, Monique Schafter, Nicholas Hayden

Researchers – Trisha Jha

Junkee Central – Steph Harmon, Alex McKinnon

Fairfax Writers – Michael Koziol, Sheree Joseph

There’s others who are part of the group who aren’t writers in publications but instead contribute to the Twitter conversation.   Everyone’s favourite Public Transport App and Photoshop Image Maker, @rpy, for example and @swearyanthony

8. Let’s See What Happens

There’s those people who may believe that I am attempting to stop or blast those in the new Sydney Push with my blog posts. But I can no more stop anything happening on the internet than Xerxes could stop the sea with his whips.  Nor would I want to. There’s a lot of interesting and engaging stuff coming from members of the new Sydney Push. I am making observations from my perspective and making historical parallels.  When I was at uni, my focus became the Australia of the 1950s – 60s – especially the Eugene Goossens scandal and the activities of the Sydney Symphony Orchestra of that time – and the era still fascinates me.  The comparisons I made are, however, at best, broad brushstroke comparisons and it was a surmising about the relationship of the new and emerging writers and new media forms.

I’m still watching and reading what emerges from this pool of young Sydney based writers – and those from other cities – and also a bit curious as to what happens next. Which one is going to be the next Clive James? Taking things back to the tone of the first post, I went to uni with a brilliantly talented woman who idolised James and had a burning desire to write and go overseas.  She followed her dream and ended up teaching at Princeton, which is where I think she still is. We caught up once and compared notes on students we taught and had some surprising things in common. But her world will always be more dazzling than mine, and fair enough.  I would not have a clue how to be and what to do in that world. I sometimes wonder if one day she’ll emerge as a pop culture icon or writing brilliant books. There’s still time – as there is for the members of the new Push.

There’s also the question – who will end up as Paddy McGuinness? I’m not sure people would be necessarily lining up for that fate.

There remains, though, the distinct possibility that I am completely wrong and that there isn’t a “New Sydney Push” and this is just a group of people who write for new media and hang around with each other because they are mates.  There always remains that distinct possibility for anything I write.  Whatever is the case, though, they will remain being fascinating to watch.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s